How to optimize conversions on non-linear marketing funnels

February 26, 2015 Asaf Rothem

A pivotal concept of marketing and sales is the funnel – through which companies systematically move prospects along the buyer’s journey: from awareness through consideration and on to purchase. But with prospects now better educated, connected, and empowered than ever, the funnel is also dramatically and rapidly changing. Can marketers still rely solely on the funnel? Our data suggests otherwise. Here’s how to optimize conversions on non-linear marketing funnels:

Overview
The funnel is part of the buyer’s journey, also known as the customer journey, which has significantly changed due to technology and access to information. Plenty of research has been written about it, by top research bodies such as Forrester and CEB. They seem to agree that most of the purchase decision is complete before a customer even contacts a vendor or brand. Furthermore, the journey now spreads over more channels and events, making attribution even harder than before. Here is a good summary by McKinsey & Co.:

McKinsey customer journey
Since attribution across the different channels is so difficult, marketers tend to focus on what they can monitor and manipulate: how prospective customers behave when they appear as anonymous visitors at their online doorstep, or as we humans call it, the website. Here, in a more controlled environment, online marketers constantly improve the output of their funnel through optimization of every part of it. And since everything is supposed to be measurable and under control, the changing nature of the marketing funnel is felt the most.

The rise of the non linear funnel

Some look at the new funnel as a change to the traditional roles of the team. Steve Patrizi thinks this is

Changes to buyer journey make it hard to optimize conversions

Others criticize him for sticking to a linear line of thinking. Mark Bonchek and Cara France posited on Harvard Business Review that “the primary problem with the funnel is that the buying process is no longer linear. Prospects don’t just enter at the top of the funnel; instead, they come in at any stage. Furthermore, they often jump stages, stay in a stage indefinitely, or move back and forth between them.”

Forrester also bid their farewell to the funnel altogether, and offered this in exchange: 

Forrester's new funnel

Others have also contributed their creative graphical abilities, as seen by a simple search of “marketing funnel” in Google images:

Major changes to buyer journey are aparent and make it hard to optimize conversions

Here you can actually see the different theories, but what does the data tell us? Let’s look at some evidence, shall we:

This is Exhibit A

Content tageting makes the most out of every touch point to optimize conversions

And this is Exhibit B

Content tageting makes the most out of every touch point to optimize conversions

BrightInfo was built to address this by offering dynamically the right content (locked or not) to each visitor at the right time to guide them through the funnel (content targeting). By clicking on this content recommendations visitors are redirected to premium content landing pages where they fill out a form. Putting it back into funnel context – this is a way to shorten the funnel and taking the visitor directly to the right content. This is what Google Analytics would register as an assist, and what Mark Bonchek and Cara France call jumping stages. So this is one way to understand that the marketing funnel is no longer linear. Furthermore, for Company B, the conversion funnel for MOST OF ITS LEADS is non-linear.

Another data point is the exit BrightBox – where visitors showed exit intent, but were engaged with a good enough offer to change their mind. Reacting in real-time to a visitor’s behavior helps to optimize conversions on all stages of the funnel – especially when it’s not linear. As you can see in exhibit B, in some sites this is the majority of leads!

IN ADDITION, an internal breakdown we ran on exit intent popups shows that up to 20% of leads we generate can come directly from lead capture widgets. These popups and slide-ins do not offer content, but rather recognize that the visitor is engaged – for example, having read 2 blog posts – and is ready to leave a few details to keep in touch. Other lead captures BrightInfo we employs act as a virtual gate to free content – turning each blog post into a premium content lead generator. These leads are even more disruptive to the concept of the marketing funnel, since they come from webpages where normally you cannot convert on natively at all: blog posts, inner product pages, etc.

To sum, BrightInfo’s data makes it pretty clear that the marketing funnel is no longer linear. We often recommend our customers to look at the funnel as a platform, and think what dynamic calls to action and overlays they need in order accompany the visitor throughout his entire buyer journey in-site. This journey is nowadays fragmented, and may take several different visits to the website. Why should visitors be forced to re-expreience the same funnel they did not find appealing the first time? Real-time Personalization, also known as content targeting, makes every touch point on the website a unique experience based upon the visitors most recent online behavior. This makes every visit relevant to the prospective customer, generating more conversions and lowering the cost of leads by up to 90%.

The post How to optimize conversions on non-linear marketing funnels appeared first on BrightInfo.

Previous Article
5 website challenges content targeting can help you solve
5 website challenges content targeting can help you solve

Content targeting touches on several online marketing levels: UX, online...

Next Article
Understanding online audiences by analyzing their content interactions
Understanding online audiences by analyzing their content interactions

Marketers today face a major ongoing challenge in understanding online...